Tech corporations demand "freedom" to exploit the software commons without contributing to it. To use open source communities and their volunteers as unpaid interns, while keeping the platforms they build on top of their work proprietary, and patent-encumbered. To ensure their ability to keep doing this, they run a constant PR offensive against copyleft licenses that oblige reciprocity, framing them as a denial of developer freedom (to prevent users and other developers using their freedoms).
Here's a typical example of developers who clearly support software freedom, but whose thinking about licensing has been distorted by this anti-copyleft FUD:
"However, not all of the software bundled provides this freedom - the GPL restricts the ability of developers who wish to integrate I2P with their own applications that are not themselves open source applications."
하지만 Secure start-up 이 비활성화되어있었다면 (디자인 가이드라인을 잘 따랐다는 전제 하에) 안드로이드식 KDF 입력값은 하드코드된 상수로 고정되어 있고 모든 걸 ARM TZ 안 Trustlet 에 의존함. 시큐어 부트 체인에 모든 걸 의존하는 구조.
Amateur Embedded hacker; FLOSS; OSHW; crypto-anarchist; Linuxer; ⚧ Genderqueer - they/them or she/her prefered; more info: blog.quendi.moe/about-pmint
Twingyeo(트잉여)는 한국어 사용자를 위한 Mastodon 인스턴스입니다.